Reaction to The Economist article of Saturday 18th June 2016 ‘Female genital mutilation: an agonising choice'

The End FGM European Network would like to comment on the article published in The Economist on Saturday 18th June 2016 entitled ‘Female Genital Mutilation: an agonising choice’.

The author claims that since campaigners’ efforts in the last three decades have not resulted in the elimination of the practice, it is time for ‘a new approach’. The article suggests that governments should ban the ‘worst forms’ of female genital mutilation (FGM) and instead ‘try to persuade parents to choose the least nasty version’, concluding that ‘it is better to have a symbolic nick from a trained health worker than to be butchered in a back room by a village elder.’

Performing these ‘symbolic nicks’ would deny that FGM is a violation of human rights and a recognised form of gender-based violence, irrespective of the degree of harm caused, or the medical qualifications of the person performing it. All forms of FGM are a violation of human rights and the right to physical, mental and psychological integrity.

All types of FGM also violate children’s rights and women’s rights and go against the principles enshrined in several international conventions, including the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (respect of physical and mental integrity, principle of non-discrimination). The global commitment to eliminate all forms of FGM by 2030 is clearly stated in target 5.3 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).

The article does not recognise the danger of women and girls undergoing FGM more than once during their lifetime – being subjected to this type of procedure would expose them to the danger a more severe form of FGM at a later date. It also does not recognise that the psychological trauma of undergoing FGM can last a lifetime and is not necessarily linked to the degree of severity of the cut. The breach of trust and physical integrity can cause trauma in and of itself.

Accepting certain types of FGM would lead to confusion for communities affected by FGM, health and other types of professionals and for those working to protect the rights of the child. It will adversely affect the work done on raising awareness of FGM, prevention and protection of girls. It adversely affects the message of prevention, which is crucial to bringing an end to the practice of female genital mutilation.

We are gravely concerned about the medicalisation of FGM - where FGM is performed by healthcare professionals. FGM has no benefits to health whatsoever and the consequences of FGM can affect a woman throughout her life. FGM carried out by trained doctors can have even more severe, long term consequences, as stated by Dr Pierre Foldes.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently published guidelines addressed to healthcare professionals calling for an end to the medicalisation of FGM. WHO states that medicalisation violates medical ethics, since FGM is a harmful practice. It perpetuates FGM and the risks of the procedure outweigh any perceived benefit, while medicalisation might also confer a sense of legitimacy on the practice or give the impression that the practice is harmless.

See also:

Letter sent to The Economist by the End FGM European Network and the Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies (MIGS).

Article in Forced Migration Review May 2015: The medicalisation of female genital mutilation by Pierre Foldes and Frédérique Martz

A repeat call for the full abandonment of FGM by WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF and UN Women

Background

The End FGM European Network is a European umbrella organisation of sixteen organisations across 11 European member states, working to ensure sustainable European action to end female genital mutilation.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures involving partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

For all further information regarding this issue, please contact Natalie Kontoulis nkontoulis@endfgm.eu or call 0032 489 709 272.

Cookies

We distinguish the following types of cookies based on their purposes:

  • Essential/ Strictly Necessary Cookies:

    These cookies are necessary to enable the website to function and cannot be disabled in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling out forms. They are essential for effective communication and facilitate navigation (for example, returning to a previous page, etc.).
  • Non-Essential Cookies:

    These cookies are not essential for the website to function, but they help us provide an improved and personalized website experience.
    • » Functional cookies:

      These cookies enable the website to offer enhanced functionality and personalization. They can be set by us or by external partners whose services we have added to our pages.
    • » Analytical cookies:

      These cookies allow us to track visits and traffic, enabling us to measure and improve the performance of our website. They help us understand which pages are the most and least popular and how visitors navigate the site.
    • » Targeting / advertising / marketing cookies:

      These cookies may be set through our website by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertisements on other sites.

We utilize both our own cookies and cookies from carefully selected partners with whom we collaborate.


Want to know more?

Take a look at our Cookie policy and our Privacy policy .

This website uses cookies to store settings and collect statistics. If you click the "Allow all" button, you are giving us permission to use all cookie types.

If you want more detailed information or to be able to set your own preferences, please use the "Customize" button.
Cookie image